So, SAA, MAA, now this? How high altitude should i keep?

Man_ILoveFishing

And what should i do now with a fighter that has ground specs. Im sorry, im not pro pilot and i don't run 200:0 with fighter. Best so far maybe 25:0 but its only taking mostly planes down with fighter. Now this is what fighters get? Also, these people that run 100:0 have wasted hours to be that gw800n4uood, i dont know about bomber but actually doing super great flying i.e with fighter is all about skill?

My recorded gameplay and good example to be screwed. Ty i enjoy it a lot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WI8S0KFvIjk&feature=youtu.be


and the gloriest one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7LOv7V4AII&feature=youtu.be


This is the distance i got hit and made 24 dmg, its not much but it's instant.

https://imgur.com/w800n4u

Trokey66

And so it starts.......

Man_ILoveFishing

Trokey66 said:

And so it starts.......

Can you provide any constructive comment?

VincentNZ

Man_ILoveFishing said:

And what should i do now with a fighter that has ground specs. Im sorry, im not pro pilot and i don't run 200:0 with fighter. Best so far maybe 25:0 but its only taking mostly planes down with fighter. Now this is what fighters get? Also, these people that run 100:0 have wasted hours to be that good, i dont know about bomber but actually doing super great flying i.e with fighter is all about skill?

My recorded gameplay and good example to be screwed. Ty i enjoy it a lot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WI8S0KFvIjk&feature=youtu.be

Well run high altitude with the fighter and dogfight instead of engaging ground targets. Or use the bombers that do not rely on flying low to engage ground targets.

Man_ILoveFishing

again, whats the point having ground specs on fighters?

MrCamp121

Gonna be GREAT when you bomber farmers on fjell start getting smacked outta the air. Glory days

Man_ILoveFishing

MrCamp121 said:

Gonna be GREAT when you bomber farmers on fjell start getting smacked outta the air. Glory days

Sure, i also hated fjell cause of it. But mostly i played fjell on ground and had no problems against bombers even tho at some games we got so badly wrecked, but its not bombers fault, its ur team.

MrCamp121

Man_ILoveFishing wrote: »

(Quote)
Sure, i also hated fjell cause of it. But mostly i played fjell on ground and had no problems against bombers even tho at some games we got so badly wrecked, but its not bombers fault, its ur team.

Not really. Its the pilots who are all the same and want their easy cheap bomber kills. The AA on fjell are useless

VincentNZ

Man_ILoveFishing said:

again, whats the point having ground specs on fighters?

Search me, I would not have given them any. The reason that DICE did it is for variety. What do you expect? Everything comes at a cost and is a compromise, why should you be able to fight with the same capabilities as the other planes, whose role is ground attack? You are manning a fighter after all.

Man_ILoveFishing

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

again, whats the point having ground specs on fighters?

Search me, I would not have given them any. The reason that DICE did it is for variety. What do you expect? Everything comes at a cost and is a compromise, why should you be able to fight with the same capabilities as the other planes, whose role is ground attack? You are manning a fighter after all.

Did you even watch videos? I mean literally did you?

Ridgeback69

Since my doctor removed salt from my diet I knew I could find some sodium free pilot salt here this morning. 

VincentNZ

Man_ILoveFishing said:

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

again, whats the point having ground specs on fighters?

Search me, I would not have given them any. The reason that DICE did it is for variety. What do you expect? Everything comes at a cost and is a compromise, why should you be able to fight with the same capabilities as the other planes, whose role is ground attack? You are manning a fighter after all.

Did you even watch videos? I mean literally did you?

Yeah and do you want me to point out again, that maybe 50-150m above ground might not be the smartest thing to do, as is flying away from a threat in a straight line. Mate you are not used to infantry being able to fight back, that's it. And again you use a fighter to engage ground threats, the most nimble air vehicle.

Man_ILoveFishing

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

again, whats the point having ground specs on fighters?

Search me, I would not have given them any. The reason that DICE did it is for variety. What do you expect? Everything comes at a cost and is a compromise, why should you be able to fight with the same capabilities as the other planes, whose role is ground attack? You are manning a fighter after all.

Did you even watch videos? I mean literally did you?

Yeah and do you want me to point out again, that maybe 50-150m above ground might not be the smartest thing to do, as is flying away from a threat in a straight line. Mate you are not used to infantry being able to fight back, that's it. And again you use a fighter to engage ground threats, the most nimble air vehicle.

So you did't watch second one, did you see my altitude when i got bashed out?

EDIT: here im gonna help you out. 
[Imgur](https://imgur.com/nUqnTXm)

VincentNZ

Man_ILoveFishing said:

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

again, whats the point having ground specs on fighters?

Search me, I would not have given them any. The reason that DICE did it is for variety. What do you expect? Everything comes at a cost and is a compromise, why should you be able to fight with the same capabilities as the other planes, whose role is ground attack? You are manning a fighter after all.

Did you even watch videos? I mean literally did you?

Yeah and do you want me to point out again, that maybe 50-150m above ground might not be the smartest thing to do, as is flying away from a threat in a straight line. Mate you are not used to infantry being able to fight back, that's it. And again you use a fighter to engage ground threats, the most nimble air vehicle.

So you did't watch second one, did you see my altitude when i got bashed out?

EDIT: here im gonna help you out. 

Yeah I saw it and you are flying 50m above ground when you first get hit and brought down to 28. Then you go straight up and get hit by the next burst, which brings you down. You simply did not expect anyone being able to fight back there.

Edit: And you got hit from multiple sources up there as well, mate.

Man_ILoveFishing

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

again, whats the point having ground specs on fighters?

Search me, I would not have given them any. The reason that DICE did it is for variety. What do you expect? Everything comes at a cost and is a compromise, why should you be able to fight with the same capabilities as the other planes, whose role is ground attack? You are manning a fighter after all.

Did you even watch videos? I mean literally did you?

Yeah and do you want me to point out again, that maybe 50-150m above ground might not be the smartest thing to do, as is flying away from a threat in a straight line. Mate you are not used to infantry being able to fight back, that's it. And again you use a fighter to engage ground threats, the most nimble air vehicle.

So you did't watch second one, did you see my altitude when i got bashed out?

EDIT: here im gonna help you out. 

Yeah I saw it and you are flying 50m above ground when you first get hit and brought down to 28. Then you go straight up and get hit by the next burst, which brings you down. You simply did not expect anyone being able to fight back there.

Edit: And you got hit from multiple sources up there as well, mate.

I did fast repair my plane, look after the fix.

Man_ILoveFishing

he should never hit me at that distance.

VincentNZ

Man_ILoveFishing said:

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

VincentNZ said:

Man_ILoveFishing said:

again, whats the point having ground specs on fighters?

Search me, I would not have given them any. The reason that DICE did it is for variety. What do you expect? Everything comes at a cost and is a compromise, why should you be able to fight with the same capabilities as the other planes, whose role is ground attack? You are manning a fighter after all.

Did you even watch videos? I mean literally did you?

Yeah and do you want me to point out again, that maybe 50-150m above ground might not be the smartest thing to do, as is flying away from a threat in a straight line. Mate you are not used to infantry being able to fight back, that's it. And again you use a fighter to engage ground threats, the most nimble air vehicle.

So you did't watch second one, did you see my altitude when i got bashed out?

EDIT: here im gonna help you out. 

Yeah I saw it and you are flying 50m above ground when you first get hit and brought down to 28. Then you go straight up and get hit by the next burst, which brings you down. You simply did not expect anyone being able to fight back there.

Edit: And you got hit from multiple sources up there as well, mate.

I did fast repair my plane, look after the fix.

Yeah, so you got punished for a mistake. You should never have been down there. That is where you died. Oh yeah you flew straight up to 150m and get hit from something else there as well, when the second FF burst hits, but that is not the time you lost.

Man_ILoveFishing

150m? dude thats atleast 300m

NLBartmaN

Stop using a plane ... Dice (and the new kids in this game) want this game to be a CoD clone with just twitch infantry play ...

Even CoD has better vehicles now ...

X_Sunslayer_X

well since pilots have thrown the term "git-gud" around since launch whenever we asked for better air-counters i will say to you and thus all pilots the following....

improvise,adapt,overcome

or if that is not possible for you ditch flying and fight on the ground thats something pilots say too "get a plane and kill the enemy bombers yourself then

so i say to you go on the ground and get rid of the fliegerfaust yourself :P

VincentNZ

Man_ILoveFishing said:

150m? dude thats atleast 300m

The moment you get hit again your squad mate is 200m away from you on E. I'd say you are flying 100-150m away from his position when we project it to the ground, which would mean the moment you are hit again to 58 you are 173 metres high, at the most.