BFV - Thoughts from our Community +700 members

13»

Comments

  • ghost_soul167
    29 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1 Member


    BF1942 Medic applying meds to himself... Bandaging animation (1:32 mark).... Similar to PubG.

    That was a fun map. Rushing the hill to cap the windmill so you can use the MG's on the germans when they spawned, or massive battles at the bridges trying to keep their armor from advancing if you lost the windmill and that bunker south of it. That's the kind of map design I miss. Points designed to create battle lines, not just run-n-gun between points.
  • Rev0verDrive
    6606 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE Member
    trip1ex wrote: »
    trip1ex wrote: »

    BF1942 Medic applying meds to himself... Bandaging animation (1:32 mark).... Similar to PubG.

    That's not an animation.

    What do you mean it's not an animation? The medic has to actively apply the meds (hold key). Med pouch is held in one hand the other kinda diddles. He cannot shoot during this process. Healing is not passive.

    THE OP and everyone talking about animations in the game are talking about the micro-movies that play when you hit a button and take control out of your hands.

    That isn't what you're showing. You're showing the equivalent of pressing a button to fire a bullet.

    I was clearly defining the difference between BF1942 Medics and BFV Medics.

    BF1942 medics had to APPLY health in a more realistic way then how BFV medics simply toss a bag/pack that passively heals on the go. Like an engineer pulling a wrench (Animation)....NOT A CUTSCENE.

    PubG style meds..... Hit a button to heal and the character goes through an animation process of applying said bandages/meds. The player still has control. He can stop applying meds by moving, equipping a weapon and so forth. If you stop applying meds, then you don't gain health.

    That's the difference. It's not a cutscene, it's an actual 3rd person character animation. Other players see it happening as it happens to you.
  • trip1ex
    3503 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, BF1IncursionsAlpha Member
    trip1ex wrote: »
    trip1ex wrote: »

    BF1942 Medic applying meds to himself... Bandaging animation (1:32 mark).... Similar to PubG.

    That's not an animation.

    What do you mean it's not an animation? The medic has to actively apply the meds (hold key). Med pouch is held in one hand the other kinda diddles. He cannot shoot during this process. Healing is not passive.

    THE OP and everyone talking about animations in the game are talking about the micro-movies that play when you hit a button and take control out of your hands.

    That isn't what you're showing. You're showing the equivalent of pressing a button to fire a bullet.

    I was clearly defining the difference between BF1942 Medics and BFV Medics.

    BF1942 medics had to APPLY health in a more realistic way then how BFV medics simply toss a bag/pack that passively heals on the go. Like an engineer pulling a wrench (Animation)....NOT A CUTSCENE.

    PubG style meds..... Hit a button to heal and the character goes through an animation process of applying said bandages/meds. The player still has control. He can stop applying meds by moving, equipping a weapon and so forth. If you stop applying meds, then you don't gain health.

    That's the difference. It's not a cutscene, it's an actual 3rd person character animation. Other players see it happening as it happens to you.

    The original post complained about animations and the revive animations. You countered by saying there always been animations (medic and repair.) And that simply is not true. Not in how the OP and everyone else uses the word when talking about BF.


  • trip1ex
    3503 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, BF1IncursionsAlpha Member
    trip1ex wrote: »
    trip1ex wrote: »

    BF1942 Medic applying meds to himself... Bandaging animation (1:32 mark).... Similar to PubG.

    That's not an animation.

    What do you mean it's not an animation? The medic has to actively apply the meds (hold key). Med pouch is held in one hand the other kinda diddles. He cannot shoot during this process. Healing is not passive.

    THE OP and everyone talking about animations in the game are talking about the micro-movies that play when you hit a button and take control out of your hands.

    That isn't what you're showing. You're showing the equivalent of pressing a button to fire a bullet.

    I was clearly defining the difference between BF1942 Medics and BFV Medics.

    BF1942 medics had to APPLY health in a more realistic way then how BFV medics simply toss a bag/pack that passively heals on the go. Like an engineer pulling a wrench (Animation)....NOT A CUTSCENE.

    PubG style meds..... Hit a button to heal and the character goes through an animation process of applying said bandages/meds. The player still has control. He can stop applying meds by moving, equipping a weapon and so forth. If you stop applying meds, then you don't gain health.

    That's the difference. It's not a cutscene, it's an actual 3rd person character animation. Other players see it happening as it happens to you.


    The original poster was complained about revive animations & animations in general in this game. You countered by saying there always been animations (medic and repair.) And that simply is not accurate. Not how the OP and everyone else defines animations when talking about BF.
  • Rev0verDrive
    6606 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE Member
    trip1ex wrote: »
    trip1ex wrote: »
    trip1ex wrote: »

    BF1942 Medic applying meds to himself... Bandaging animation (1:32 mark).... Similar to PubG.

    That's not an animation.

    What do you mean it's not an animation? The medic has to actively apply the meds (hold key). Med pouch is held in one hand the other kinda diddles. He cannot shoot during this process. Healing is not passive.

    THE OP and everyone talking about animations in the game are talking about the micro-movies that play when you hit a button and take control out of your hands.

    That isn't what you're showing. You're showing the equivalent of pressing a button to fire a bullet.

    I was clearly defining the difference between BF1942 Medics and BFV Medics.

    BF1942 medics had to APPLY health in a more realistic way then how BFV medics simply toss a bag/pack that passively heals on the go. Like an engineer pulling a wrench (Animation)....NOT A CUTSCENE.

    PubG style meds..... Hit a button to heal and the character goes through an animation process of applying said bandages/meds. The player still has control. He can stop applying meds by moving, equipping a weapon and so forth. If you stop applying meds, then you don't gain health.

    That's the difference. It's not a cutscene, it's an actual 3rd person character animation. Other players see it happening as it happens to you.


    The original poster was complained about revive animations & animations in general in this game. You countered by saying there always been animations (medic and repair.) And that simply is not accurate. Not how the OP and everyone else defines animations when talking about BF.

    Revive Animations Take toooooo long ... I wonna Run n Gun ... waiting sucks.

  • WheatThins25
    14 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1 Member
    GUNNY1966 wrote: »
    ( 1 ) Re-Spawn times = SUCKS
    ( 2 ) All the animation = SUCKS - Wait time to get back into the game = REDICULOUS
    ( 3 ) The time to die or get revived = SUCKS - Either you get revived or you don't, forget the animation = REDICULOUS
    ( 4 ) Vehicles not functioning as the should = REDICULOUS
    ( 5 ) Tanks shoot buildings & the building still stands, same as 180mm = REDICULOUS
    ( 6 ) Tanks can't run over cars or street post, bounces off static objects = REDICULOUS
    ( 7 ) Air vehicles are pretty much = REDICULOUS
    ( 8 ) All German or British vehicles, No P40D Mustangs or B17 bombers of which were the most DOMINATE vehicles during the war = REDICULOUS
    ( 9 ) Trench coats on characters, Maybe in the Ardennes but I assure you there were no Women there only as nurses = REDICULOUS
    ( 10 ) The game play is decent but the reality is far from the GENUINE BATTLEFIELD series & honestly it's disappointing = TRUTH

    You have taken the BATTLEFIELD series & improved it over the years with the EXCELLENT gameplay in BF2142 / BF3 / BF4 & now this! I as well as many others are at a total loss & if we wanted a COD / MOH style gameplay we would have just went to that style of gameplay. Most simply don't get it but we BATTLEFIELD VETERANS DO GET IT! Some of us have been playing for +22 years & we have all came to the consensus that you have TOTALLY removed yourselves from the ORIGINAL SERIES & for that we are disappointed. The above mentioned is from +700 members of just one single community & we all discussed this in a open forum. Some of the topics that were brought up & there's more to it than just these few but overall it's NOT good. Currently we are seeking other avenues of game releases to get a better idea of what & where we might go as most believe we can find a new developer whom will LISTEN to the COMMUNITIES instead of a bunch of kids!

    You do realize that Battlefield V is the bi-product of BF1 and Battlefront as both titles were develop by Criterion Games and Motive Studios witch also had a hand in Battlefield V.
  • blackghost17
    50 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1 Member
    I say screw all this DLC and addon crap and give us the SDK. It is what created BF2 anyway. Without the SDK we would have never got any of these BFs. I bet if they gave us our SDK back after removing it after 1942- 2142. This series would jump harder the GTAV Modded gameplay videos.

    Just imagine a 100 player server with a parachute map. Pure freaking genius. 10vs10 tanks like a real BF not just 3vs3 measly tank battles. You wanna make money EA? Down the graphics and up the player cap. That is how BF1942-2142 sold copies. Mods and player cap. Nobody was really playing vanilla after we learned about eh SDK. A lot of ppl was playing forgotten hope, project reality and desert combat. Bring back the SDK or raise the player cap and the game is set. Stop this mileniall graphics BS already. Weere gonna be at 64 players in 2020 at this rate when some games will be at 100vs100. It's 2018 not 2006.
  • GUNNY1966
    485 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Member
    Well I actually have learned some things from some of the comments & as for my spelling WGAF! You chime in on most comments yet your missing the point obviously but that's okay I'm not a keyboard Rambo so I'll simply say your right & leave you think you know everything with all the experience you have. The game isn't that good unless you wish to ground pound & BF4 was a challenge if you had one squad member that did nothing but snipe & for the most part this game is LOADED with snipers. Glad I was corrected with all your enlightening information. As for the planes, they suck! Have a nice day!
  • xxxCoOlBr33zExxx
    3277 postsMember, Moderator, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Hardline, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, BF1IncursionsAlpha Moderator
    After reading the initial post, all I see is a wall of non-constructive text.

    If you’re going to complain please provide constructive feedback on the issues and what you would like changed. Simply Saying everything is ridiculous is just construed as whining and non-constructive.

    It’s easy to complain but apparently harder to provide useful and constructive feedback.
  • parkingbrake
    991 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Member
    GUNNY1966 wrote: »
    ( 8 ) All German or British vehicles, No P40D Mustangs or B17 bombers of which were the most DOMINATE vehicles during the war = REDICULOUS

    As the two battles depicted in the beta were at a time when the United States had not yet joined the war, wouldn't it be a bit odd for American aircraft to be present, especially one not yet in production? BTW, the P40 and the Mustang are two different aircraft. As for the B17, as it is not a tactical attack aircraft what exactly would you have it doing in BFV, carpet bombing from fifteen or twenty thousand feet?
    The above mentioned is from +700 members of just one single community & we all discussed this in a open forum. Some of the topics that were brought up & there's more to it than just these few but overall it's NOT good. Currently we are seeking other avenues of game releases to get a better idea of what & where we might go as most believe we can find a new developer whom will LISTEN to the COMMUNITIES instead of a bunch of kids!

    If your community really has 700+ members, surely there is one with a better grasp of spelling, grammar and syntax than you, hopefully one who can also put together a coherent argument. "SUCKS" and "REDICULOUS" repeated over and over is not reasoned criticism, it's just chanting a slogan with no explanation of why you dislike that which you are tying to criticize. Next time get someone who has at least put together a college research paper or something along those line to post your community's feelings, maybe he'll at least be understandable.
Sign In or Register to comment.