Population Died off Quickly?
1546 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Hardline, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, Battlefield V Member
Last week when searching for servers to play Conquest on I'd get at least 30 results. This week I get less than 10, tonight at one point I couldn't even get a single result.
I only get to play late at night/early morning so that explains partially why there are so few servers in NA, but still that much of a drop off seems ominous...
I only get to play late at night/early morning so that explains partially why there are so few servers in NA, but still that much of a drop off seems ominous...
4
Comments
I'm betting this is a factor. I forever play Conquest, but the last couple days I've been mired in Frontlines trying to get the new MMG.
Anyone tried BF1 and checked how things are over there?
Hopefully this will change after Firestorm is released.
And to all the people who said something to this effect in response to many of the posts that showed up on the forum...”quit complaining, nobody wants to hear it, nobody cares if you leave and go back to BF1...and other things to that effect....we’ll they did quit. And now you have much less people to shoot at and enjoy the game with.
If it continues well have nobody to shoot at.
So for any of those who are frustrated and thinking of leaving. Give the new patch a chance and play with a squad, I think this game has huge potential.
I'm really considering just quitting myself now.
What's the point of continuing to TRY to play when I get back no servers and/or every server I try to join says is full even though it also says there are empty spots? It won't even let you stay queued to a server for whenever a spot opens, so I just have to constantly refresh and hope a server pops up AND didn't get filled immediately. And then if I finally manage to join it's always on the losing end of a stomp. So the whole experience is just 10/10 fun.
Takeaway the upgrade system on guns and customization and you're left with a barebones game. I'm sure the devs worked hard but as a customer I am not impressed with what I bought and don't care for any excuses they may have for this game.
Well said
Why is barebones? It isn’t but the people who cried about paid DLC have a lot to answer for as it could have been so much more. As it stands I feel I’ve more than had my money’s worth out of it and will be playing it for a good time yet.
Bs companies have been cutting content for a long time now and still are demanding 60bucks if we are lucky and then demand we pay for the rest of the game in DLC which is wrong. Star Wars battle front comes to mind. Now we get buggy games that don’t even pass. As a beta tested game with virtually no content at all with micro transactions for the rest of the character content with a deluxe prices for games running 80-150 bucks so knock that nonsense off about people upset about this game and complaining, then asking how is this game barebones. Are you nuts or just used to getting screwed . Let’s sell you a new car with no wheels or transmission as a standard package and another 10gs for the rest of the car and a DLC fee for your warranty. Customers are given a horribly non functioning games with no content and then developers demand more then 60 bucks to get the rest of the game in DLC. Then get all high and might about the customers they screwed over crapping all over their game.
No people are just entitled nowadays. They don’t want to pay for anything regardless of the work that’s gone into it.
This crying about DLC is a newish phenomenon, never used to happen. Back in the day people couldn’t wait to get the newest map packs and DLCs. They paid the, pretty cheap price, and enjoyed it rather than whinging that they couldn’t play because they didn’t have the same content.
As far as the car analogy goes it’s wrong. It would be people complaining that they haven’t got the optional extras on their car that others have because they wouldn’t pay for them.
DLC has always been an optional extra. Either buy it and enjoy it or don’t. But don’t whinge about it.
You sir are the perfect example of the drone a company wants who is excited to get less and less content for more money, you are required to debug your own game and we are supposed to be happy if they ever get around to fixing the game .
What EA and others have released is down right insulting to players and my car analogy was the perfect for what we are seeing. We are trying to get the same triple a product and are asked to pay for more of an investment in the game, and manufactures of these games are giving us less and less content the. Advertised. They then demand that if pay additional funds or buy a high tier package, then we may get to have the rest of what was coming to basic $60 game not even 10 years ago.
What is being given to us now would not even be a passing Alpha stage of the games development and we according to you and others that we should be exited and thankful for what we are given as a “finished game”. Because of people like yourself defending their actions as acceptable they continue to do it. If we did a poll on here that if players knew what we knew now about how incomplete and buggy this game was before it was released would they still buy it. I would bet 75% of those who did buy it before and are very disappointed in what was delivered would not even look at the cover at the store. The game wouldn’t even sell 1million
This one definitely feels like it launched as more of a work in progress, but BF1 wasn't without it's issues as well, and it ended up being retweaked and massaged into an outstanding all around game in my opinion. I'm thinking similar will happen with this one, but I think even with it's flaws, it launched with some "good bones" so to speak.
Outside of PubG, I haven't played any other shooters aside from Battlefield, so maybe my perspective is skewed, but I just don't see this game as being close to "non functioning".
Based on my playtime, this game has cost me about $0.66 per hour to play.
I am confident that I don’t have as many hours logged as most - especially some of this game’s harshest critics - so the game is even more cost-effective for them.
I’ve said it many, many times before, but video games have cost at least $60 since 1991 (they dropped to $50 during the Xbox cycle, but then went back up for the 360).
The content we get in 2019 blows away what we got in 1991, not even accounting for inflation.
Thing is though your experience isn’t that of everyone it’s cetainly not mine mines never crashed. Perhaps your XBox is dodgy, there’s so much going on processor wise in a BF game if it’s worn out or malfunctioning I’m not surprised it crashes.
I am in agreement with Mishkin37, my game currently works out at around 60p an hour. Compare that to the movies, around £5 an hour, watching my football team play, £12 an hour, it’s bloody good value and that cost per hour will go down even more as I intend to keep playing.
As Mishkin points out game prices haven’t really changed but they are much better value nowadays. I remember buying a game for the Megadrive back in 92, it cost me £50, think it was Terminator or some such and I’d finished it in about 3 hours.
In fact I’ve been buying video games since I got a Spectrum in 1982 and I’ve never had the value or time played that I get from Battlefield titles.
I stick to my original comments.