- 79 Battlefield V - Announcements
- 25.6K Battlefield V - General Discussion
- 830 Battlefield V - Firestorm Discussion
- 4.5K Battlefield V - PC Community
- 1.7K Battlefield V - PlayStation Community
- 1.4K Battlefield V - Xbox Community
- 1.3K Battlefield V - Platoon Recruitment
- 35 Battlefield V - Bugs & Issues
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
Son, I have lived a life most ppl like you can't even fathom. Spare me the "no life" part. If you can't understand that, then you are more of a idiot than this world can't even imagine.
You're right. Is not a good thing or behaviour.
But when he wrote that i have done something to hide my profile on battletracker .... my hand wrote"stupid" without thinking about the consequences. Anyway there is a ability to hide comments from a specific user?
How have they wrecked BF4 ? you do know Battlelog is still in use and i have never used the UI update !
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/
Oh my dear, sweet god. I really, really agree SO MUCH with that statement. It is actually quite saddening when even a factual comment in this forum gets ridiculed by other users... THANK YOU! There seem to be decent BF users left...
As it is directing abuse towards others, Yes, Yes it is a violation of the Forum Guidelines.
And not just the Forum Guidelines, But the EA Terms Of Service too.
As outlined in section 6.
http://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/en/en/PC/#section6
And since calling others "idiots" or "noobs" is deemed as harrasment, You can ( and will ) be actioned accordingly.
@neuTi
There is nothing "decent" about violating ToS.
And yes, anyone that thinks calling other users names is not to be tolerated is DECENT in my book.
We're all adults and can form a reasonable debate without it devolving into a childrens playground with name calling / stats bashing and so on.
I am actually surprised with quite a few users, How they can post something really constructive and on point but then throw it all away because they felt the need to try to insult others, At that point all credibility just flew out of the window.
As a Veteran Battlefield player I am asking.... Is DICE even around..?
Funny how we can talk to MMO developer's and have them address open crowds (at fanfairs, etc) and let them know (personally) what the community needs and what they (developer) are working on.... in support of their player base.
When is the last time EA CEO, or DICE developer's attended open forums at gaming conventions..? Heck, has anyone even sat down with the CE0 of Electronic Arts, or Lead Devs ..? About the rampant cheating..? And their own lack of effort & killing off, of their own Franchise and Platform.
Cheating is a crisis and the battlefield Community wants to know what is being done about it.
Subsequently, marketing & lipservice is not support.
And DICE/EA does not support this community. I (& others here) have been a part of it since the beginning (beta 1942) and I have never left the game or Franchise. And now we are seeing what we get, for supporting and making DICE what they are today...
Understand, I am a grown man and not upset here. I am horrified at how EA can be throwing all this money down the drain and ruining an absolutely brilliant product..! And, as a self-proclaimed professional Battlefield player, I can easily say that if I was CEO of EA, DICE would be a billion dollar company.
.
i was angry , is not my usual
Yes, Sorry SniperSixNine.
Ok i can stop with this forum, never i will wirte more here or ... bye bye , i quit.
Nobody is saying don't post.
We just expect users to post constructively and without the abuse or otherwise breaking the rules.
We aren't asking a lot from people.
1) New maps are all over place. The quick matches for some reason are split between vanilla and dlc maps but all i get are the DLC maps! I am not fond of the new maps except for Fort de Vaux
2) The server browser is broken in my opinion. I sometimes look up servers with only one criteria and that is "Conquest" and all i get are like 2 populated servers with only DLC maps in rotation.
3) Hit-reg is so completely off from game to game. An example are headshots when sniping. If an enemy is head glitching and all i can see is his head and i register a hit, it should be an automatic kill, not an 80 hit marker. Same with unloading a full 20 rounds into a guy and not getting the kill when i record all my games and the shots are dead on. I'm also sure the hit box extends beyond the body which makes it even more confusing to me as to what is happening.
4) High ping players. Yesterday i played on a 64 player server where i would say at least 10 guys were over a 200 ping. Admin's need to be able to kick these players. This could also be affecting my hit reg.
5) Lopsided games. I am not sure when this started happening but i don't remember them this bad? Most games are either a big loss or big win with the occasional close game thrown in there.
6) Gas detection. Ever since they nerfed gas grenades it seems like i am getting killed more by them because i can't tell i am sitting in it! In the past we would start to cough but now if there is dust, debris etc kicked up and gas is set off at the same time, i can't tell it's going!
This guy has balls to say sorry
the problem is (from my Point of view) as follows: go to any (!) BF franchise Forum (BF 3, BF 4, this one...) and there are always the same complaints. But the same people seem to play on and on. Apart from the fact that this kind of complaints is not constructive - what exactly should they do? I think that DICE has listened to the community (see CTE or the much better start of BF 1 compared to BF 4), although I still will quit playing for the moment. But with player Ratings being this high, why would they Change something in the grand scale of schemes?
But I remember the Battlefield 2 days...
Where there was actual community support. NOt this stand-off'ish braddock stuff. We had constant contact with DICE developers and our community involvement made for a great platform & excellent community. We learned from each other.
Today..? We don't even have 24 channels of 3D audio, no Clan Servers, no Battle Recorder, no anti-cheat, no Commanders (squad points) , no flightstick or oldschool game controls...? (!)
Battlefield games are much more shallow now, than before. They just have more glitz, but lost it's guts...
And I am not taking anything away from what DICE has done with it's frostbite engine/platform, it's evolution of physics is why I keep playing. But it is still lacking and I hope something like AMD's 3D True Audio becomes a thing within Vulkin.
But the constant lack of features, or forgotting/dismissal of others can't be directed by profits, it is about EA/DICE not investing enough money into their teams. There is a lack of insight running the show. We demand better products than the garbage they have been giving us over the last 7 years. Battlefield 1 is brilliant, but unplayable do to the crisis.
I would say Battlefield 2142 was DICE's last great BF Franchise game. Even though later games improved graphically, BF2142 gameplay & groups was great. Much of which has been lost or amiss within the franchise. Battlefield Bad Company 2 was great, but the larger open operation maps in BFV, BF2, BF 2142 had far greater battles & gameplay. Much greater decision making, than anything these close quarters coin-op maps DICE keeps developing for the kids. Adult PC crowd demands more thought. Holding an area isn't a thing anymore, bcz... objectives are meant to be unprotected & abandonded in BF1. (New maps are nothing more than a single-player mosh pit.)
Where is DICE's grand Opus of a map..? (CQC is overdone imo. Movement & strategy are a part of oldschool battles.)
Does DICE need help in making a grand open field objective map? Even these remakes of Originals lost the context of rock-paper-scissor-shotgun & are bland replicas. I appreciate the narratives and Campaigns .. but wasted Dev work imo. Too stooped in CGI history and voice overs, not enough in actual landscape/gamescaping or expanse, to make for larger strategic battles. DICE keeps the narrative large but puts out FFA maps aimed at consoles...
They have forgotten that Battlefield is a group sport & seeking objectives is the point. Reward PTFO.
It is also evident that EA/DICE have a demographic issue with PC crowd. We are not the same as the Console crowd & we have money to burn. No need to ask mommy here..
The PC gamer expects a quality PLATFORM. EA is ignorant to think PC Clans were going to downgrade to console standards. How is EA/DICE forgetting that a vast portion of People build $2k+ rigs to play BF... & DICE got caught selling a child's console game with free hax included in the box. There is no actual support for the PC platform. They just keep making changes to the game, without adding any actual support to longstanding needs/wants of PC gamers. Just to have some feature work, like it use to in earlier games. But years later... derp..
Honestly, as an example how can ANY Battlefield game not have mouse roll over for all weapons. When it was for the first 4 Franchise releases..? And not even as a toggle..? We as a community have been hearing lipservice about mouse-roll-over since BFBC2, then BF4, then BF1.. etc. Such simple to fix-add, that if anyone at DICE actually played their own Platform they would know.
I am holding a candle to EA/DICE, because I think they can do way better.
Go look at the average BF Vietnam patch... look at the detail of breadth of each patch note. Look at the frequency of them, as well.
EA/DICE needs to step up and start supporting the Player base & respecting their own Platform. DICE needs to answer the Communities pleas with a modern form of anti-cheat (root kits?) and a stronger EULA, in supporting fair gameplay infractions, etc..