- 79 Battlefield V - Announcements
- 25.5K Battlefield V - General Discussion
- 824 Battlefield V - Firestorm Discussion
- 4.5K Battlefield V - PC Community
- 1.7K Battlefield V - PlayStation Community
- 1.4K Battlefield V - Xbox Community
- 1.3K Battlefield V - Platoon Recruitment
- 35 Battlefield V - Bugs & Issues
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
I'm calling it Zombie Hack!
"You can't stop crime but you can control it"
The problem is that on PC it doesn't feel EA/DICE are doing they're best to keep it fair for everyone.
This is the same response I kinda saw on Battlefront forums. Can you imagine if the CEO just came out and said: "Well... that's too bad. Maybe you should go buy a console instead?"
Like I said, I suck...my bf tracker stats show that....I've played FPS before, but this is the first one I've really tried to spend some time with to get better...and I have improved a little. It doesn't mean I can't tell when something shady is going down.... Like getting one shot by an Automatico or LMG from 100-200 yds away through fog when I'm running....it's happened, and on more than one occasion. The people who claim to have never seen cheaters are either downright stupid, ignorant and unwilling to admit there is a problem, because with their 'leet' skills the cheaters don't matter to them, or cheaters themselves. Sorry, not sorry.
You need open your eyes then..
2. That said, the various BF1 cheats have already been downloaded by -- at a minimum -- tens of thousands of players, so that's an awful lot of peeps that are running around all hacked up, likely using the more subtle cheats such as esp and the judicial use of aimbotting.
3. Such subtle cheaters are the hardest to catch from an admin's perspective, and that's why client-side ACs have been a part of virtually every halfway decent fps game for going on well over a decade now; without such automated protection, even the best of admins can and do get swamped by the massive amounts of spectating that rooting out such hackers requires.
@banger162nd you dump kid do you understand that the 30% is in the snipers and thats bad for them. rest is 13-17%, and there we can see how bad players hackusate even the most avarage players with only looking at the statistics. wonder why battlefield is full of cheaters according to all under 1kd players. but the rest just can not seem to see them weird huh ?
Probably a cavalry or other elite class. I usually get 14 damage on them.
I tried a player rented server some minutes ago saying "no cheats" in its description , i was shot 3 times in less than a minute 2 times thru multible walls and one time headshot with a pistol from very very far away.
PC = cheat , console = no cheat
Putting 'no cheat' into the server description is like a magnet for cheaters...
its not stop cheaters its the way you effectively manage the problem
bf1 does not effectively manage the problem
hense FREE cheats and Free programs , and they injecting straight into client ,
do i want to play this game , no not really not as a foot soldier at least , ill bomb them with planes till i get bored then log out
Fairfight cannot detect hacks. It can only detect players using them based on server side statistics that they collect while you're playing. They have no client side anticheat so they cannot detect hacks being injected into the game.
Unfortunately, Fairfight is poor at detecting subtle cheaters and it often bans legitimate players to.
Yeah but I really hoped if someone of some importance seen what is being used they would at the very least look in to it. The way things are silenced I imagine they don't even know half of what is being used. I assume they spend their time working on more things to sell us then looking for the newest cheats. Apparently I stupidly thought making sure they seen what is being used would let us know that they either have the info and choose to ignore it or they didn't bother looking for it and after seeing it would at least say they are looking in to it. I would be happy if they just got it pulled from that forum.
2. It is very hard for even highly experienced admins to detect and prove the more subtle hacks like walling, so any even halfway decent game needs a solid client-side anti-cheat program to help cut down the number of amateur cheaters, which buys the admins the breathing space that they need to spectate the (much smaller) number of suspected hacks that slip through the AC filter.
3. Lacking such an AC program, most admins will simply get swamped by the sheer volume of cheating -- with tens of thousands of players having loaded up on hacks, there is just no way that even the most veteran of clanner admins can keep up with numbers like those.
All ppl aren't expecting EA to fix this problem with a new AntiCheat, but they are hoping. Fairfight isn't a real anitcheat, it's pure ¯\_(ツ)_/¯! And the reason ppl want this is because they actually like the game, and want to play it. A better Anticheat won't remove all cheaters, but atleast it will take care of some of them, make ppl think twice about cheating & and maybe if lucky you will play against a cheater a couple of times a day, instead of every other game!
admins are human too. In BF4 some admins were protecting cheaters as they payed for the server.
It is better..but not the total solution.