What was the reasoning for adding planes to Fjell?

2»

Comments

  • fakemon64
    898 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Hardline, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, Battlefield V Member
    Deulcore wrote: »
    Not every maps needs planes and tanks 1 or 2 just need infantry quite simple really not rocket science

    There are infantry only gamemodes though...however i do wish there were vehicle only gamemodes in the game
  • American_Outlaw
    61 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Member
    Bombers on Fjell makes the map go from Extremely Bad to Absolutely Horrid!!!
  • SirBobdk
    5318 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    Fjeld should have had a lot of tunnels and undergound places for infantry to fight.
    Only time you should go out side would be to get to the next flag.
    Then Planes wouldn't be a problem. Right now its a farming place for planes.
  • parkingbrake
    3202 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    Deulcore wrote: »
    Planes on fjell is just ridiculous who thought up that stupid idea

    Presumably a dev who thought the game needed a map where rookie pilots could get bomber kills.
  • CSO7777
    1877 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, BF1IncursionsAlpha, Battlefield V Member
    Bombers on Fjell makes the map go from Extremely Bad to Absolutely Horrid!!!
    Exactly. The map would something argonne forest on BF1, which could be entertaining.

    But with planes it just becomes stupid. Some of the flags are not worth taking at all because the cap area is not bigger than the bombs splash-damage-area.

    Making a map where planes can just drop bombs on contested flags for lots of multikills is so bad and shows that Dice makes some pretty stupid decicions in their map design.
  • JediMastaWyn
    586 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Hardline, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, Battlefield V Member
    Fjell with no planes and Devastation with no tanks would be great infantry only maps.

    Wait there's a tank on Devastation :o

    Planes make Fjell somewhat tolerable. Beautiful looking map and great idea but it's no Alborz Mountains. With out planes it's just another narrow, peak a boo corridor shoot out. But in the snow!
  • CritiKal_DamAge
    14 postsMember, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Hardline, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    Deulcore wrote: »
    Planes on fjell is just ridiculous who thought up that stupid idea

    Presumably a dev who thought the game needed a map where rookie pilots could get bomber kills.

    I agree. Im a rookie when it comes to flying and even i can get kills fairly easy. A skilled pilot can make an already bad map very frustrating.
  • Psychloan
    74 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    Developer: "Hmm, the bottlenecks on this map are creating stalemates with so many players, let's add planes to take a few ppl away from the main game."
  • Faylum
    440 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    Just to farm infantry or what? Would have been a better map without any kind of bombers, or planes of any kind, just a pure infantry map would have been better.

    Fjell isn't suppose to be a Conquest map for infantry, it's a place holder map for Air Superiority!
  • DropInDropOut
    355 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    Fjell with no planes and Devastation with no tanks would be great infantry only maps.

    Wait there's a tank on Devastation :o

    Planes make Fjell somewhat tolerable. Beautiful looking map and great idea but it's no Alborz Mountains. With out planes it's just another narrow, peak a boo corridor shoot out. But in the snow!

    Oh yeah, but they don't last long.
Sign In or Register to comment.