- 75 Battlefield V - Announcements
- 22.5K Battlefield V - General Discussion
- 775 Battlefield V - Firestorm Discussion
- 4.1K Battlefield V - PC Community
- 1.6K Battlefield V - PlayStation Community
- 1.3K Battlefield V - Xbox Community
- 1.1K Battlefield V - Platoon Recruitment
- 35 Battlefield V - Bugs & Issues
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
Good, so why are you complaining then? When it the nerfs happens you should be equally satisfied to use it as the way it was before. Right?
My accusation was based on you thinking aggressive play needs to be punished in a game as camper friendly as battlefield v 🙄
If the aggressive player is careless and/or oblivious, then yes.
Which is already super easy to do, so there's really no need for one shotting ap mines. People could place down 2 before and get the same effect.
Then stop being careless and/or oblivious.
If you are observant and/or wary of the threat, damage is irrelevant as you shouldn't encounter them or be able to avoid/destroy them.
That's about as good as argument as saying "oh just don't group up" if grenade launchers were able to one shot. ie, a bad argument. A fire and forget type of equipment shouldn't be able to one shot people. Not to mention that being able to oneshot is an insanely strong buff compared to how it was before. Before people used to be able to deny entrance through 1 entrance by placing 2 mines and kill anyone trying to enter that way. Now they can do it with 3 entrances. If people can't see how insanely strong that is, they need to remove whatever is covering their eyes.
He said rushing.
To be fair,
Rushing=/= aggressive play
Not really. Sure not all aggressive play is rushing, but rushing is an aggressive play.
Oh, the irony!
Big yikes
Like it really matters? I'm just gonna put down 2 instead of 1... You are still gonna die to mines.
It does matter yeah. You can only have 3 mines active at once, so right now you can deny 3 places easily. As it was before you could deny 1 place and have another place where the enemy would just get weakened.
A single mine could end up doing damage and not kill.
So no change for me.
I'll just do what I used to do: Deny a hall or somewhere with 2 mines, and stick the other one at a health station. There's a huge chance that people going there are injured, so kills are extremely likely with just 1 (pre-buff/after-nerf) mine.
I think you're arguing a strawman and trying to change what he means. He clearly explains in later posts.
"What, you mean I have to let go of the W key?!"
ActionMan.exe has stopped responding.
Not really. Battlefield is infamous for camping, battlefield v is probably one of the worst in the series, so buffing gadgets that punish people for being aggressive is stupid in my opinion. Even if the only aggressive players who get hurt by it are people who just zerg rush without using their brain.
Deep.....