So here is my feedback so far...
played 5 rounds squad and won 2 of them.
also played 2-3 rounds solo, just dropped to the hotspots to be unlucky with loot and get fackd...
i won't play firestorm anymore cuz i don't need that luck based BR thing in Battlefield!
BR never was my cup of tea and it's still not with firestorm
i'll keep playing regular Battlefiel till someone can tell me a good alternative game (send me a message here)...
I don't like it because usually, it''s a lot of running around and no action, then when there is action it's usually over in seconds, or you get shot as soon as you've dropped and you haven't even found a gun. It's just BR basically.
-Weapons: Why are they coming with attachments already on them? It would be a much better approach to be able to pick up attachments and add them to your chosen weapon, that way you could adapt it to your own needs (like the Apex approach). For instance, the Level 3 KAR-98 automatically comes with a x3 scope on it, which defeats the idea of it being a long range rifle.
I feel this is a personal preference.
I hate the Apex method. It TOO itemized. The tiered weapon approach is much
Even scopes? I feel like putting your choice of scopes on your weapons is sort of just expected in fps these days. Although due to aim assist on consoles I guess scopes dont matter as much as they do on PC
Yeah i think it's suffering a bit from the low 64p player count. The circle pace needs to be tweaked [circle downtime needs reducing and start sooner] and fully close at the end. One of my games lasted 27 mins + and felt super empty which can cause some games to becoming less engaging [solos].
It’s actually a really good aesthetic decision, artistically speaking. In visual art interest is creating through contrast (color contrast, value contrast, directional contrast, etc.). It’s called “counterpoint.” What would contrast a blazing firestorm better than snow and ice? The answer is “not much.”
If DICE excels at anything it’s visual art. They know art theory and they know what they’re doing.
No servers for South Africa? Pings of 220 with such a bad delay making it unplayable for the whole community here. How does games like apex and fortnite not have this problem... frustrating... Hope this can be improved over time
-Weapons: Why are they coming with attachments already on them? It would be a much better approach to be able to pick up attachments and add them to your chosen weapon, that way you could adapt it to your own needs (like the Apex approach). For instance, the Level 3 KAR-98 automatically comes with a x3 scope on it, which defeats the idea of it being a long range rifle.
I feel this is a personal preference.
I hate the Apex method. It TOO itemized. The tiered weapon approach is much
Even scopes? I feel like putting your choice of scopes on your weapons is sort of just expected in fps these days. Although due to aim assist on consoles I guess scopes dont matter as much as they do on PC
Why do people keep repeating this? We don’t have aim assist on consoles.
after Mercury in May that will only be 2 DLC maps total for core BFV game modes in the first 6 MONTHS after release. how much more "clear" could they be?
I am still making my mind up about it.
There is a good reason I am a bf player not a br player I don't like coming up against people who have loads of armour or amazing weapons purely through luck.
After 8 games now and reading posts about it I think I am getting the hang of the ui now but it still just seems wrong and untested there should have been a ui training video or new addition to the practice range.
I like exploring a new map but I tend to just sort out a close range weapon and a long range then get on with playing the game not messing about constantly trying to get loot, that's just boring.
I did have some fun playing with a squad on mic though people have a habit of jumping out the plane uncoordinated and going off getting distracted by loot instead of playing as a squad.
Give us some of that new map in normal bf and I probably wouldn't bother with fs.
Comments
played 5 rounds squad and won 2 of them.
also played 2-3 rounds solo, just dropped to the hotspots to be unlucky with loot and get fackd...
i won't play firestorm anymore cuz i don't need that luck based BR thing in Battlefield!
BR never was my cup of tea and it's still not with firestorm
i'll keep playing regular Battlefiel till someone can tell me a good alternative game (send me a message here)...
Ps.
we need more maps and dedicated servers thx!
Well, maybe they ll understand that nobody gives a F about BR in battlefield...
Next question.
Even scopes? I feel like putting your choice of scopes on your weapons is sort of just expected in fps these days. Although due to aim assist on consoles I guess scopes dont matter as much as they do on PC
Bizarrely, I thought the very same thing this afternoon.
by all means i hope you enjoy it when BR is the only mode left in BF games.
If DICE excels at anything it’s visual art. They know art theory and they know what they’re doing.
Why do people keep repeating this? We don’t have aim assist on consoles.
after Mercury in May that will only be 2 DLC maps total for core BFV game modes in the first 6 MONTHS after release. how much more "clear" could they be?
There is a good reason I am a bf player not a br player I don't like coming up against people who have loads of armour or amazing weapons purely through luck.
After 8 games now and reading posts about it I think I am getting the hang of the ui now but it still just seems wrong and untested there should have been a ui training video or new addition to the practice range.
I like exploring a new map but I tend to just sort out a close range weapon and a long range then get on with playing the game not messing about constantly trying to get loot, that's just boring.
I did have some fun playing with a squad on mic though people have a habit of jumping out the plane uncoordinated and going off getting distracted by loot instead of playing as a squad.
Give us some of that new map in normal bf and I probably wouldn't bother with fs.