Does Aerodrome need one more vehicle?
286 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
At the moment Aerodrome feels like a barren landscape filled with bipods and snipers and the main focus is the hanger. Also the push and pull effect on this map is based on the infantry. One tank on the battle doesn't change the flow of the game and this tank is always the focus point on the map and has no real impact.
I think by adding one vehicle, an tank for example making both side have two vehicle to spawn a better flow of the map where a group or cluster will go around the map and capturing multi map instead of just camping in the hanger in the middle of the map. Both teams do now have a option to pick a heavy, medium or even a light tank combination.
This will make the group more versatile of defending the borders or hanger and be more mobile and not just sit in one spot camping the map. Also the bipoded support players and sniping scout player need to work better instead of just be there on the flank or in the back of the map.
I think by adding one vehicle, an tank for example making both side have two vehicle to spawn a better flow of the map where a group or cluster will go around the map and capturing multi map instead of just camping in the hanger in the middle of the map. Both teams do now have a option to pick a heavy, medium or even a light tank combination.
This will make the group more versatile of defending the borders or hanger and be more mobile and not just sit in one spot camping the map. Also the bipoded support players and sniping scout player need to work better instead of just be there on the flank or in the back of the map.
1
Comments
Yea why we have a map based on an airfield with zero aircraft boggles me, yet theyre on fjell
Normally an airfield gets bombed in a war. Which isnt what happens in this game since theres no aircraft. But sure if you say so