Weekly Debrief

vehicles poisoning this game

13»

Comments

  • mf_shro0m
    1709 postsMember, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Hardline, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    (Quote)
    Vehicle balance was a lot more tolerable in BF3/4. Dice didn't try to copy War Thunder or World of Tanks, they had their own vision of vehicle combat. In BF5 they have absolutely no idea what they want.

    They wanted to appease all the people who think assaults should be able to easily kill tanks by themselves and they got their wish. Dice just chucked tankers under the bus

    Giving vehicles 6 specialisation slots was a great move and now they need to make assaults at least half as realistic as tanks are by giving them momentum and making it so you can’t hipfire a Faust like an SMG
  • mf_shro0m
    1709 postsMember, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Hardline, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    wasp9166 wrote: »
    jeeps with 5 guys in em just running over everyone , i mean , can a jeep go 80 mph over hills and sh?

    barely enough time to ads once you see it 

    What are you on about??

    I’ve never seen that and jeeps in this game are about as scary as a kid who dressed as a Pokemon for halloween. They’re literally just free points for assaults
  • IDirtY_SeCreT
    544 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, BF1IncursionsAlpha, Battlefield V Member
    xeNizKing said:
    ro7hbard said:
    Do you remember those OP helicoptes in BF4? Couldn't even take them down with anti-air. 
    You clearly didn't play when Spawn camping AA tanks were grossly overpowered and even after you could still very easily take out the attack choppers. People just needed to work together because of the flare system thats it. 

    He confuses BF4 and BF3. The Attack Chopper was good on one map, Shanghai. On all others it was hiding behind cover to avoid active radar and 30mm shredding...
  • Tip_the_Cap
    279 postsMember, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Hardline, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    Well...

    I really miss some AT option on recon, except for the AT rifles.

    On top of that, the PIAT could use a buff.

    The Piat was buffed coming out of the gates, but because it was good, Dice nerfed it.
  • MBT_Layzan
    1617 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    edited November 9
    wasp9166 wrote: »
    jeeps with 5 guys in em just running over everyone , i mean , can a jeep go 80 mph over hills and sh?

    barely enough time to ads once you see it 

    What are you on about??

    I’ve never seen that and jeeps in this game are about as scary as a kid who dressed as a Pokemon for halloween. They’re literally just free points for assaults
    True that!
  • YourLocalPlumber
    3010 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, BF1IncursionsAlpha, Battlefield V Member
    (Quote)
    Vehicle balance was a lot more tolerable in BF3/4. Dice didn't try to copy War Thunder or World of Tanks, they had their own vision of vehicle combat. In BF5 they have absolutely no idea what they want.

    They wanted to appease all the people who think assaults should be able to easily kill tanks by themselves and they got their wish. Dice just chucked tankers under the bus

    Giving vehicles 6 specialisation slots was a great move and now they need to make assaults at least half as realistic as tanks are by giving them momentum and making it so you can’t hipfire a Faust like an SMG
    Or add some kind of mobility/aim nerf to AT weapons when soldier is hurt. Its unfair when someone does 10 damage to a tank and disables its turret/tracks making tank completely screwed while infantry can take 99 damage and happily bunny hop away as if nothing happened.
  • SendTheInfantry
    777 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    (Quote)
    Vehicle balance was a lot more tolerable in BF3/4. Dice didn't try to copy War Thunder or World of Tanks, they had their own vision of vehicle combat. In BF5 they have absolutely no idea what they want.

    They wanted to appease all the people who think assaults should be able to easily kill tanks by themselves and they got their wish. Dice just chucked tankers under the bus

    Giving vehicles 6 specialisation slots was a great move and now they need to make assaults at least half as realistic as tanks are by giving them momentum and making it so you can’t hipfire a Faust like an SMG
    Or add some kind of mobility/aim nerf to AT weapons when soldier is hurt. Its unfair when someone does 10 damage to a tank and disables its turret/tracks making tank completely screwed while infantry can take 99 damage and happily bunny hop away as if nothing happened.
    Nah, that Quick Repair spec is there for a reason.
  • wasp9166
    96 postsMember, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    wasp9166 wrote: »
    jeeps with 5 guys in em just running over everyone , i mean , can a jeep go 80 mph over hills and sh?

    barely enough time to ads once you see it 

    What are you on about??

    I’ve never seen that and jeeps in this game are about as scary as a kid who dressed as a Pokemon for halloween. They’re literally just free points for assaults
    shroom asking me  what i'm on, classic 
  • DrunkwoIf
    306 postsMember, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Member
    SeolsongK said:
    so many tank and they are so important if ourside tanker is noob and the other is good the game will be very disgusting
    and planes,most human all knows how to use that easy things and they ruining infantry experience too
    WHY they cant be nerf???a 64 people game just because they hand fast and 50plus people are there meat?
    Tank just need to cut down their number BUT planes must nerf anti infantry ability
    (post edited slightly by moderator to avoid provocative phrasing)


    This is probably the worst BF game they have made as far as vehicle warfare and you think this is to much? hahaha

    sorry i never do this but

    go back to CoD
  • Stalinium9
    59 postsMember, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    Carbonic said:
    Carbonic said:
    Well...

    I really miss some AT option on recon, except for the AT rifles.

    ......
    That's the spotting scope. Sometimes when you spot a tank like that you will be amazed how quickly bombs and rockets find their way to those stealthy buggers.
    I know, but what if enemy has ace-pilot or map doesnt have planes? Like Aerodrome? Game misses long range instruments to deal with them. They cant be countered if they camp near out of bounds, since noone can flank them. They will farm away from there. Its not fun and bad mapdesign imo.
    I very much believe Aerodrome should have more buildable cannons and some infantry improving measures in the typical tank camping spots on that map to offset the lack of planes. That, however, is more a conversation about what Aerodrome lacks than of what vehicles in general.
    We dont need buildable cannon in Aerodrome.  SQ leaders need to call pakwagen.
  • hkspm123
    119 postsMember, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, Battlefield V Member
    hkspm123 wrote: »
    (Quote)
    Problem is that attack wont be coordinated , teammate possibly dont even try anti tank lol

    I regularly solo tanks so teamwork isn't even needed. I see a tank going to town killing everything I single mindedly go to kill it until its gone, same for planes if a plane is doing well I'll get a fighter out and try to own the sky.
    It depend on maps , no way a camping tank on panzerstorm ever get takes out solo
  • g0merpile
    680 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield Hardline, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V Member
    Carbonic said:
    Carbonic said:
    Well...

    I really miss some AT option on recon, except for the AT rifles.

    ......
    That's the spotting scope. Sometimes when you spot a tank like that you will be amazed how quickly bombs and rockets find their way to those stealthy buggers.
    I know, but what if enemy has ace-pilot or map doesnt have planes? Like Aerodrome? Game misses long range instruments to deal with them. They cant be countered if they camp near out of bounds, since noone can flank them. They will farm away from there. Its not fun and bad mapdesign imo.
    I very much believe Aerodrome should have more buildable cannons and some infantry improving measures in the typical tank camping spots on that map to offset the lack of planes. That, however, is more a conversation about what Aerodrome lacks than of what vehicles in general.
    We dont need buildable cannon in Aerodrome.  SQ leaders need to call pakwagen.


    You nailed it there buddy, the squad leaders want to save the points for the k-boom effect, this is something that needs to change if a commander sucks badly we need a kick system
  • DingoKillr
    3660 postsMember, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield, Battlefield 1, CTE, BF1IncursionsAlpha, Battlefield V Member
    xeNizKing said:
    ro7hbard said:
    Do you remember those OP helicoptes in BF4? Couldn't even take them down with anti-air. 
    You clearly didn't play when Spawn camping AA tanks were grossly overpowered and even after you could still very easily take out the attack choppers. People just needed to work together because of the flare system thats it. 
    Maybe he was talking about Scout copters which also exist on maps without MAA. It a bit hard to take out a Attack copter when it is on the same side as the MAA.
Sign In or Register to comment.