Having trouble accessing the forums? Try logging out of the forums completely - clear cache, cookies, and temp files - then restart the browser and log in. Thanks!
God forbid someone actually likes to play as infantry as well as in vehicles.
God forbid someone doesn't want to partake in the daily anti-tank circle jerk that normally takes place on these forums.
God forbid someone prefers traditional approaches to game balance, and not abusing game exploits to "get even".
I don't really care one way or another... But balance?? If a tank can hide out of bounds for the enemy and literally not even take fire how is that balance? Lol. Obviously this video shows exploitation, at least it's comical though. A guy camping for 30 minutes in a spawn with a tank and going 100-0 isn't quite as funny..
God forbid someone actually likes to play as infantry as well as in vehicles.
God forbid someone doesn't want to partake in the daily anti-tank circle jerk that normally takes place on these forums.
God forbid someone prefers traditional approaches to game balance, and not abusing game exploits to "get even".
I don't really care one way or another... But balance?? If a tank can hide out of bounds for the enemy and literally not even take fire how is that balance? Lol. Obviously this video shows exploitation, at least it's comical though. A guy camping for 30 minutes in a spawn with a tank and going 100-0 isn't quite as funny..
You're still bringing up the "camping tank going 100-0" scenario as if that invalidates my point at all.
If you think camping from a distance with tanks is a game balance issue, then by all means push for a change that will reduce the effectiveness of that tactic.
Advocating to exploit a game engine flaw to use a weapon in an unintended manner, however, is simply wrong.
God forbid someone actually likes to play as infantry as well as in vehicles.
God forbid someone doesn't want to partake in the daily anti-tank circle jerk that normally takes place on these forums.
God forbid someone prefers traditional approaches to game balance, and not abusing game exploits to "get even".
I don't really care one way or another... But balance?? If a tank can hide out of bounds for the enemy and literally not even take fire how is that balance? Lol. Obviously this video shows exploitation, at least it's comical though. A guy camping for 30 minutes in a spawn with a tank and going 100-0 isn't quite as funny..
You're still bringing up the "camping tank going 100-0" scenario as if that invalidates my point at all.
If you think camping from a distance with tanks is a game balance issue, then by all means push for a change that will reduce the effectiveness of that tactic.
Advocating to exploit a game engine flaw to use a weapon in an unintended manner, however, is simply wrong.
I stated that it's clearly exploitation. I don't disagree there. The only thing I find funny is the only people this would truly annoy is guys who like to pad that kd with tanks. It's like AA, only people who say it needs nerfed are people who spend all of their time in planes, effectively making them invincible lol. Obviously once again an exploit. I'm interested in seeing if they even do anything about it
God forbid someone actually likes to play as infantry as well as in vehicles.
God forbid someone doesn't want to partake in the daily anti-tank circle jerk that normally takes place on these forums.
God forbid someone prefers traditional approaches to game balance, and not abusing game exploits to "get even".
I don't really care one way or another... But balance?? If a tank can hide out of bounds for the enemy and literally not even take fire how is that balance? Lol. Obviously this video shows exploitation, at least it's comical though. A guy camping for 30 minutes in a spawn with a tank and going 100-0 isn't quite as funny..
You're still bringing up the "camping tank going 100-0" scenario as if that invalidates my point at all.
If you think camping from a distance with tanks is a game balance issue, then by all means push for a change that will reduce the effectiveness of that tactic.
Advocating to exploit a game engine flaw to use a weapon in an unintended manner, however, is simply wrong.
I stated that it's clearly exploitation. I don't disagree there. The only thing I find funny is the only people this would truly annoy is guys who like to pad that kd with tanks. It's like AA, only people who say it needs nerfed are people who spend all of their time in planes, effectively making them invincible lol. Obviously once again an exploit. I'm interested in seeing if they even do anything about it
On the contrary - it can be argued that reserved tankers who work behind the front lines will take longer to reach, and thus are more likely to spot suicide jeeps than aggressive tankers who get closer to the action and have more potential dangers to worry about.
This is an exploit that can be used on objective-oriented tankers as well as the "K/D padders". You can't just lump everyone who disagrees with something into one category.
God forbid someone actually likes to play as infantry as well as in vehicles.
God forbid someone doesn't want to partake in the daily anti-tank circle jerk that normally takes place on these forums.
God forbid someone prefers traditional approaches to game balance, and not abusing game exploits to "get even".
I don't really care one way or another... But balance?? If a tank can hide out of bounds for the enemy and literally not even take fire how is that balance? Lol. Obviously this video shows exploitation, at least it's comical though. A guy camping for 30 minutes in a spawn with a tank and going 100-0 isn't quite as funny..
You're still bringing up the "camping tank going 100-0" scenario as if that invalidates my point at all.
If you think camping from a distance with tanks is a game balance issue, then by all means push for a change that will reduce the effectiveness of that tactic.
Advocating to exploit a game engine flaw to use a weapon in an unintended manner, however, is simply wrong.
I stated that it's clearly exploitation. I don't disagree there. The only thing I find funny is the only people this would truly annoy is guys who like to pad that kd with tanks. It's like AA, only people who say it needs nerfed are people who spend all of their time in planes, effectively making them invincible lol. Obviously once again an exploit. I'm interested in seeing if they even do anything about it
On the contrary - it can be argued that reserved tankers who work behind the front lines will take longer to reach, and thus are more likely to spot suicide jeeps than aggressive tankers who get closer to the action and have more potential dangers to worry about.
This is an exploit that can be used on objective-oriented tankers as well as the "K/D padders". You can't just lump everyone who disagrees with something into one category.
I specifically said I think those types of tankers (the I only play for kd tankers) are worse. Once again I did state this was an exploit. I also think I agree with you more than you think I do lol
In a nutshell, it was clearly not intended, it's an exploit and it's cheap.
The fact so many condone (any kind) of exploit, bug, cheap unsportsmanlike play style even if it doesn't effect them, even if it's funny, just speaks volumes. I don't even play this game anymore, it's about the principle for what it's worth.
Hell it's not even accepted but celebrated by some.
So being basically untouchable in a tank and farming infantry to go 100-0 is "Sportsmanlike".
This entire thread = tankers who sit back and farm infantry getting triggered because their farming tools can now be circumvented
Lol, have you looked at your own posts? You're among the most triggered on these forums.
All it takes is someone to whisper "Hellriegel" in your ear and you'll instantly suffer from a PTSD episode.
This entire thread = tankers who sit back and farm infantry getting triggered because their farming tools can now be circumvented
Lol, have you looked at your own posts? You're among the most triggered on these forums.
All it takes is someone to whisper "Hellriegel" in your ear and you'll instantly suffer from a PTSD episode.
Everyone needs to relax. If you haven't, go play silk road on bf4, put some c4 on a bike and speed off....find a dune or ramp to launch off, jump off and hit the detonate button as your bike lands on a tank.....if you don't have fun doing that, well then the game is not the problem.
In a nutshell, it was clearly not intended, it's an exploit and it's cheap.
The fact so many condone (any kind) of exploit, bug, cheap unsportsmanlike play style even if it doesn't effect them, even if it's funny, just speaks volumes. I don't even play this game anymore, it's about the principle for what it's worth.
Hell it's not even accepted but celebrated by some.
So being basically untouchable in a tank and farming infantry to go 100-0 is "Sportsmanlike".
Get real.
So exploiting the game against tanks is fine, what's next, hacks as long as they pass the 100-0 mark or is that a step too far?
Call me whatever, I'm just not going to cheat to get one up on anything no matter how high their score.
If you don't get it, then I doubt you will anytime soon.
God forbid someone actually likes to play as infantry as well as in vehicles.
God forbid someone doesn't want to partake in the daily anti-tank circle jerk that normally takes place on these forums.
God forbid someone prefers traditional approaches to game balance, and not abusing game exploits to "get even".
My infantry K/D is actually better than yours.
Sorry I don't have as much time to play as you do. I actually have productive things to do with my life than sit and play video games all day.
Comments
I don't really care one way or another... But balance?? If a tank can hide out of bounds for the enemy and literally not even take fire how is that balance? Lol. Obviously this video shows exploitation, at least it's comical though. A guy camping for 30 minutes in a spawn with a tank and going 100-0 isn't quite as funny..
You're still bringing up the "camping tank going 100-0" scenario as if that invalidates my point at all.
If you think camping from a distance with tanks is a game balance issue, then by all means push for a change that will reduce the effectiveness of that tactic.
Advocating to exploit a game engine flaw to use a weapon in an unintended manner, however, is simply wrong.
I stated that it's clearly exploitation. I don't disagree there. The only thing I find funny is the only people this would truly annoy is guys who like to pad that kd with tanks. It's like AA, only people who say it needs nerfed are people who spend all of their time in planes, effectively making them invincible lol. Obviously once again an exploit. I'm interested in seeing if they even do anything about it
On the contrary - it can be argued that reserved tankers who work behind the front lines will take longer to reach, and thus are more likely to spot suicide jeeps than aggressive tankers who get closer to the action and have more potential dangers to worry about.
This is an exploit that can be used on objective-oriented tankers as well as the "K/D padders". You can't just lump everyone who disagrees with something into one category.
I specifically said I think those types of tankers (the I only play for kd tankers) are worse. Once again I did state this was an exploit. I also think I agree with you more than you think I do lol
So being basically untouchable in a tank and farming infantry to go 100-0 is "Sportsmanlike".
Get real.
We shall knock on your tank first, tell you there is a pizza delivery, shake hands, then one of us will go kaboom.
Lol, have you looked at your own posts? You're among the most triggered on these forums.
All it takes is someone to whisper "Hellriegel" in your ear and you'll instantly suffer from a PTSD episode.
Daaaaaaaaamnnnnnn!!!
Seriously. You can counter the Jihad Jeep with one shot from a Kolibri lol. It's funny how all these tankers are so upset about this.
Don't want to get flanked by a Jihad Jeep? Then get some gunners to cover your back.
So exploiting the game against tanks is fine, what's next, hacks as long as they pass the 100-0 mark or is that a step too far?
Call me whatever, I'm just not going to cheat to get one up on anything no matter how high their score.
If you don't get it, then I doubt you will anytime soon.
My infantry K/D is actually better than yours.
Sorry I don't have as much time to play as you do. I actually have productive things to do with my life than sit and play video games all day.
How? What are you actually doing??
It was fun