Impossible to play without seeing a cheat
This discussion has been closed.
- 83 Battlefield V - Announcements
- 26.3K Battlefield V - General Discussion
- 841 Battlefield V - Firestorm Discussion
- 4.7K Battlefield V - PC Community
- 1.8K Battlefield V - PlayStation Community
- 1.5K Battlefield V - Xbox Community
- 1.4K Battlefield V - Platoon Recruitment
- 35 Battlefield V - Bugs & Issues
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
The run with 6ms is 184ms on average? Because that would make it kinda slow overall.
https://dotesports.com/counter-strike/biggest-vac-ban-wave-in-history-15710
I don't think there's any official ban reporting by FF other than the in-game messages. The whole thing is shrouded in mystery, unlike the transparency of VAC. Even the months old tweet from a Dice producer about some new AC in BF has since gone uncommented on as far as I'm aware. Other companies also transparently leverage their community to spot cheaters that fly under the radar of the AC software in an open and transparent way. All you get after you make a report on Origin is a "we'll look into it", and nothing more.
Also worth noting that prior to BF1, meta sites could pick up the FF and PB bans and add the GUIDs to their meta-ban list, which become global bans for games it streams. All that's gone now in BF1. Clearly EA/Dice do not like global bans as it costs them money, which, as I've noted before, is the most important thing to them.
Wrong!
Even in spectator mode despite it's flaws it's still very much possible to recognize unnatural aiming patterns, how else do you think I'm able to see through these cheats when I'm spectating them? The problem is that most of you don't know how to recognize the (subtle) differences between pure human and artificially 'enhanced' aiming. Also, cheats (aimbots in particular) have become a lot more sophisticated through the years, so it's very important to know how they have changed and how closet cheaters use them now in order to recognize them.
Here is another more lengthy censored video of a cheater (using a headshot aimbot and possibly ESP hack) who I encountered recently, it's not the same player as the 10 second video:
There you go
Thank you for this, that does give 100 ms more wiggle room to cheaters when using spectate. On more edge cases it would certainly raise questions, but I do not think the potential 100 ms difference is enough to explain the pixel perfect locks on moving players in these videos.
Steam bans over 40K players
still better than a 10 seconds low quality film showing only you know what. Post more plz I am having a good laugh
Definitely the largest VAC wave ever, but it is worth noting that CS:GO seems to be the most cheater infested FPS you can play right now (with even some pros getting caught). I run into less cheaters on BF1, it is just that a single cheater can ruin a game for 63 people.
If you play the game enough and are good, you're going to go on long killstreaks because many times you run up against large groups of players that are terrible/newbs.
And from that video I didn't get a feel for the surround sound the player was experiencing nor noticed the visual indicators showing where bullets came from. Both are very helpful in determining where enemies are. Not to mention if you play enough you can guess where enemies are coming from 80% of the time and you know where the good hiding spots are.
Just to confirm ... @Stormfirebird is correct.
The tick rate for spectator is 10Hz. Plus you need to account for latency of delivery. Spectating isn't P2P. It's client to server to spectator. You only get the actions/movement/shots the server has received. If the player is below the threshold (160/200ms), then you only see shots the players client determined where hits. You won't ever see the misses unless the player is above the threshold.
Indeed because it doesnt trigger a reflex, however shooting at human shaped objects and reacting to sounds and being hit: https://gfycat.com/ShimmeringWebbedAllensbigearedbat
Though admittedly recognizing human shapes is the hardest part in BF1 as everything blends together far too well.