I didn't even know the game existed. It's only $34 and can't be any worse than BF5 as long as there are people playing it, I'm going to try it out. By watching the trailer it looks way better than BF5 but trailers are usually deceiving.
Why is the word n azi even censored? It isn't a swear word, and it is part of a very bad (but important) part of history.
I notice communist and socialist aren't censored and they've killed more people than n azis ever did.
If my post gets delet…
You know BF as a whole is on a major decline when this much attention is being brought to ONE new map. A thread about ONE new map. Not an expansion pack, not a map pack, but ONE map.
It isn't even a very good map, it's mostly a cluster with a bunch…
Why wouldn't it? There's no real long term reason to play this game after it gets even a little boring.
Everyone with 50 hours or more is at top rank with everything unlocked.
BF2 did a good job with ranks.
They had real ranks, and it took a long time to hit most of them.
You couldn't go from First Sergeant to Major in 3 days like in BF5.
That would be awesome. I would love and would pay for a 5-6 map DLC of the Pacific theatre.
Having said that, it'll be some 5 on 5 crap or some new skins.
Yes how dare someone pay $80 for a war FPS and expect more than a game with 9 small maps where strategy is almost pointless, countless glitches, no anti-cheat, no private servers, terrible netcode and no helis in conquest?
The nerve.
Btw thanks …